by David Ronfeldt and John Arquilla
This is another interesting article from First Monday, about the noosphere - a realm of communal mind conceived of 80 years ago by Teilhard de Chardin, but only now enabled by cyperspace - and its impact on grand strategy and diplomacy in the form of noöpolitik. The authors' thoughts on noöpolitik will be collected in a forthcoming handbook on public diplomacy.
| Table 1: Contrast between realpolitik and noöpolitik. | |
| Realpolitik | Noöpolitik |
| States as the unit of analysis | Nodes, non–state actors |
| Primacy of hard power (resources, etc.) | Primacy of soft power |
| Power politics as zero–sum game | Win–win, lose–lose possible |
| System is anarchic, highly conflictual | Harmony of interests, cooperation |
| Alliance conditional (oriented to threat) | Ally webs vital to security |
| Primacy of national self–interest | Primacy of shared interests |
| Politics as unending quest for advantage | Explicitly seeking a telos |
| Ethos is amoral, if not immoral | Ethics crucially important |
| Behavior driven by threat and power | Common goals drive actors |
| Very guarded about information flows | Propensity for info–sharing |
| Balance of power as the “steady–state” | Balance of responsibilities |
| Power embedded in nation–states | Power in “global fabric” |
No comments:
Post a Comment