by David Ronfeldt and John Arquilla
This is another interesting article from First Monday, about the noosphere - a realm of communal mind conceived of 80 years ago by Teilhard de Chardin, but only now enabled by cyperspace - and its impact on grand strategy and diplomacy in the form of noöpolitik. The authors' thoughts on noöpolitik will be collected in a forthcoming handbook on public diplomacy.
Table 1: Contrast between realpolitik and noöpolitik. | |
Realpolitik | Noöpolitik |
States as the unit of analysis | Nodes, non–state actors |
Primacy of hard power (resources, etc.) | Primacy of soft power |
Power politics as zero–sum game | Win–win, lose–lose possible |
System is anarchic, highly conflictual | Harmony of interests, cooperation |
Alliance conditional (oriented to threat) | Ally webs vital to security |
Primacy of national self–interest | Primacy of shared interests |
Politics as unending quest for advantage | Explicitly seeking a telos |
Ethos is amoral, if not immoral | Ethics crucially important |
Behavior driven by threat and power | Common goals drive actors |
Very guarded about information flows | Propensity for info–sharing |
Balance of power as the “steady–state” | Balance of responsibilities |
Power embedded in nation–states | Power in “global fabric” |